| By Vu Lam | Article Rating: |
|
| December 21, 2012 12:00 PM EST | Reads: |
1,877 |
Software developers and service providers need a period of usability testing before launch to find out how the product stands up in the hands of end users. An experienced QA team will ferret out bugs and identify major issues, but they won't use your software like a customer will. The value of focus testing is not up for debate, but the way you run it most definitely is.
How Does It Work?
Crowdsourcing-based usability testing services is an emerging niche and you'll find a choice of online services capable of delivering valuable information on your product's usability. Try My UI and User Testing are two good examples and they both offer the chance to see potential customers using your software in real-world conditions. The pricing varies, but you're looking at $35 to $39 per tester for a single test and there are discounts for bulk orders.

You provide the software and a set of instructions and the testers complete the task you set out in their own homes. Their computer screens are recorded so you can see exactly what they are doing and they provide a running audio commentary to explain their thought process. This is a fantastic way to get detailed feedback and immediately identify any usability issues that you may have overlooked. Each video has a maximum time limit of 20 minutes.
Benefits over Traditional Usability Testing
The key benefit is obviously the cost savings, because traditional usability testing is very expensive. Crowdsourcing is actually superior in other ways as well. The turnaround is incredibly fast; you can get same-day results, potentially even within an hour, which would be impossible if you were setting up a series of tests with a focus group in a lab setting. You can also get feedback 24/7 so if time is a factor, or you want to enact quick changes and test again, you can do so.
Consider also the benefit of having testers who are for the most part working from home and therefore relaxed and without expectations. The process of coming into an unfamiliar setting for a test can actually skew the results. With this kind of online testing you are really getting as close to an end-user experience as possible.
What's the Downside?
No solution is ever perfect and so it's important to mention a couple of limitations. This kind of testing in 20-minute chunks is best suited to examining how users interact with a menu or interface system, or how they perform a relatively simple task with your software. There isn't time to go into any great depth.
You also have to consider the demographic you need. You'll find the option to choose an age range, average household income, country, gender, level of expertise, and you can add more stringent guidelines. The system is not ideal if you have very specific needs. For in-depth screening to pinpoint a real niche bracket of testers, you will need to look elsewhere.
The Proof Is in the Testing
With such a low upfront cost and quick turnaround there really is no reason not to give it a try. Any feedback that enables you to streamline your product and improve usability is worth the investment. You can easily annotate or edit the videos you get in from testers and that can be a useful tool to present your findings to the rest of your company and spark the response you need to perfect that software before it goes to market.
Published December 21, 2012 Reads 1,877
Copyright © 2012 SYS-CON Media, Inc. — All Rights Reserved.
Syndicated stories and blog feeds, all rights reserved by the author.
More Stories By Vu Lam
Vu Lam is founder and CEO of QASymphony, developers of defect capture tools that track user interactions with applications. He was previously with First Consulting Group and was an early pioneer in Vietnam’s offshore IT services industry since 1995. He holds an MS degree in electrical engineering from Purdue University. You may reach him at vulam@qasymphony.com.
- Cloud Expo New York | Danger Ahead: Why File Sync Is NOT Endpoint Backup
- Session Topics: 12th Cloud Expo / Cloud Expo New York
- Cloud Expo NY: Best Practices for Architecting Your Cloud Infrastructure
- Cloud Expo New York: Aligning Your Cloud Security with the Business
- Overview of the OpenStack Cloud
- Cloud Expo New York: Managing Legal Risks in Cloud Computing
- Cloud Expo NY: Environmental Pressures Drive an Evolution in File Storage
- Cloud Expo NY: Accelerating Cloud Computing with Intel SSD Technology
- Is Cloud Safer Than Your Traditional Datacenter?
- Apple’s Key Rubber-Band Patent Found Invalid Again
- NIST to Sponsor FFRDC Widespread Adoption of Integrated CyberSecurity
- Cloud Expo New York: Anatomy of an Internet Scale Application
- Cloud Expo New York Speaker Profile: Jill T. Singer – NRO
- Cloud Expo New York | CEO Insider: Overcoming Cloud Barriers
- Cloud Expo New York | Danger Ahead: Why File Sync Is NOT Endpoint Backup
- Session Topics: 12th Cloud Expo / Cloud Expo New York
- SAML Finds Its Cloud Legs
- Cloud Expo NY: Best Practices for Architecting Your Cloud Infrastructure
- Cloud Expo New York: Aligning Your Cloud Security with the Business
- Overview of the OpenStack Cloud
- Cloud Expo New York: Managing Legal Risks in Cloud Computing
- Five Steps Toward Achieving Better Compliance with Identity Analytics
- Cloud Expo NY: The Promise of an End-to-End SDN Solution - Can It Be Done?
- Guest Post: Typical CIO Conversation
- Effective Page Authorization In JavaServer Faces
- The Top 250 Players in the Cloud Computing Ecosystem
- Cloud Expo New York Call for Papers Now Open
- SOA Focus - Web Services Security in Java EE
- IBM Security Report Predicts Mobile/Satellite Attacks in 2005
- Industry Experts Discuss the State of Cloud Computing
- The Cloud Computing Kettle Heats Right Up
- The Top 100 Bloggers on Cloud Computing
- The Next Chapter in the Virtualization Story Begins
- Java Application Security in the Corporate World
- ColdFusion Security Best Practices
- Cloud Expo 2011 East To Attract 10,000 Delegates and 200 Exhibitors



















